10/01/2011

Greed


I grow weary of reading, especially from good writers who are in the thick of it all, like Glenn Greenwald, about Wall Street and Greed. Greed did not cause the financial disaster. Greed is simply (one) part of who we are. Knowing that violence is a potential we all have inside us, we create, sustain and actively reinforce systems from micro to macro to mitigate our violent tendencies. Of course our systems aren't perfect, but we generally agree that violence is something we don't want too much of, and so we can appeal to these co-created systems--laws, customs, religious convictions/commandments, personal principles, interpersonal relationships, to protect ourselves and each other from the very real violence that can well up inside each and every one of us and gush out into the world.

No, it wasn't Greed that caused the crisis. The creation, sustaining, and expanding of systems that enable our Greed was what caused the great cave-in of 2008 ('09,'10,'11...). Or, we could say that the roof fell in on us due to the deliberate and collectively unchallenged dismantling of the societal systems that had been keeping our own Greed from devouring us. I pat myself on the back for the timely mining metaphor. Down there, you ignore the systems that keep you safe at your own peril. We correctly call this reasoned caution 'Conservative'. Of course, like in our mining metaphor, most of us are down there, in the mine, and are rightly conservative with the conditions of our own well-being. Predictably, the few radicals, or Neoliberals (who are to Liberals what neosoul is to soul) interested in ignoring the safeguards are up top, and too big(-headed) to (consider the catastrophic consequences of their actions which will fall onto others if they) fail. Sometimes they even convince a miner or two (or millions) of their quaint/crackpot/dangerous management theories. For the most part though, down in the mine you know that if that roof caves in it doesn't care whether you're a foreman or a grunt, a newbie or a 40-year veteran about to retire (or for that matter any other kind of "difference" you can think of). It turns out that the systems we create to safeguard us from the most destructive parts of ourselves work best if we're all inside the same room, facing the same consequences. Some used to call it "society".

In the leadup to our present morass, and apparently seductive enough to weather a modicum of international scrutiny and a light, brief public flogging, some societal systems directly rewarded Greed in the form of enormous short-term benefits, like young broker pay incentives, to name but one example. Some ideologies lying around, (like a club, ideologies are desirous of being wielded), most notably The Friedmanism, pretended to believe that "greed is good", *, that somehow a "market" (a term which, by the way, refers to the collective known as 'all of us', to varying intensities, depending on our wealth and how/where we invest it) unrestrained by societal forces that mitigate greed would alchemically turn shit into gold bars with which we could beat the shit out of each other, in order to have more shit to make more gold. I know, it sounds like a child made it up. That is, a poor, brutish child who has suffered many hardships and privations (like, say, the Industrial Revolution, or the Twentieth Century). But, in some sense of course, that is who we are.

A teacher of mine in high school once clarified for us, "Here in America we have the notion that everyone can be a billionaire. That's just not true. Many complicated factors notwithstanding, it is true that anyone can become a billionaire--but not everyone." Imagine 300 million billionaires. What would it mean, then, to be a billionaire? $16,000 muffins. Nope, it's a game of contrasts, and most of us delude ourselves to some degree into investing our precious emotional, physical and mental efforts into playing that lotto, hoping for a miracle, imagining our feet up on the desk in that single wide trailer, smoking a cigar, watching the miners go in and out of that dark hole, basking in the cheap cologne smell of our self-evident exceptionalism, barking orders to the foremen down below to ignore the rules that keep them and the men and women they are responsible for, and with whom they will live and die, safe.

Now, some might say we should go up top and kill that son of a bitch. While I can comprehend the presence of that kind of anger, I'm telling you that to go and nurture it, even for a second, to cultivate it into bloodthirst, is indefensible. We all live and die together in this mine; to fortify the very behaviors that would tear us apart doesn't make any sense. No--we all have a part to play: after all, in our modern world we need administrators!

No--I say we just go up top and move him and his double-wide back down into the mine.



* (thank you kindly to anyone who could please direct me to writing on how an extreme "Christian" Evangelism coexists with raggedy Randy Ayn?)

11 comments:

  1. I totally missed the first asterisk-- but the connection between Ayn Rand and Evangelicals is not hard to discern out via Google. A lot of religious people are really in it for the ideology (i.e. rationalizing what feels good in some grand context), but that's sort of your topic here anyhow I suppose.

    I like the part about beating the shit out of people with gold bars made from shit in order to make more gold.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Also, more thoughts. The sermon at my church was on the fourth commandment, about keeping the Sabbath day holy. Our pastor said, "Rest is a protest against the way things should not be." Falling to your knees in gratitude is a form of strike (perhaps to extend the miner metaphor).

    And there is something to be said there about our sins and in what way we are to blame for experiencing desire. Work sublimates desire, but it doesn't change it. The aesthetic dimension, which is so deeply connected to desire, could really stand to be brought back to a Kantian idea of detachment. Daily life creates rhythmic sounds and demands movement and exposes us to hypnotic visual ephemera, and to organize those into ritualized forms of sensation could certainly make us let go of the daily activity of which all those sights and sounds and movements seemed to be just empty phenomenal side effects.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I've been wondering these days how the occupywallstreet protests will sustain themselves without a serious, coordinated, trained and disciplined non-violence. Which, to me means believing in something bigger than yourself (secular difficulty #1), and being willing to suffer for it (materialist difficulty #2)--in the most brutal moments relying on the hope, love and righteousness that come from that bigger belief rather than collapsing into the hatred and despair of everyday existence. Plus, where is the singing? Not 2 line chants screamed out (which are great, too), but actual songs with meaning and melody. It seems to me a successful non-violent campaign needs God and singing, to fortify, unify and testify.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Seems like this singing could relate to your "ritualized forms of sensation".

    On another note, the pepper spray videos certainly implicate the NYPD, but protesters shredding their vocal cords screaming "WE ARE BEING PEACEFUL!!!" with rage and fear in their voices was the most stunning image of those videos to me. I fully support those protesters, but they are going to consume themselves without some serious discipline--is it about "letting off steam" or changing reality? Because that's a long, arduous, disciplined haul.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I support them too, in that Wall Street corruption is bad. But capitalism feeds on revolution-- and some anarchists will throw bricks, just like some Tea Party shitheads will wave nooses (which is worse, but the effects are sort of parallel if not similar).

    Pepper spray is vicious, but they don't actually have any concrete realizable demands, do they?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Reverend Paul Brandeis Raushenbush writes today,
    "Nonviolence requires the discipline to transcend the immediate satisfaction of justice provided by revenge; and instead project and expand one's mind and spirit into a time when the pain, loss and inequity will be redeemed through an ongoing process that involves confrontation, truth, repentance, reconciliation, mercy and justice."
    Happy Birthday, Gandhi-ji!

    ReplyDelete
  7. was it a double-wide or a single-wide?

    ReplyDelete
  8. His cigar humedor and particle board desk are in the single-wide, onsite. He lives down the road in a well appointed, modern double-wide with stainless steel appliances. I think we should bring him down into the mine in the double-wide and have him work from home, to save on overhead. The single-wide will stay next to the mine entrance, and hopefully the Special Envoy from the Galactic Council will see it, infer that we're all down there, and come and rescue us. That's the plan so far.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thank you for the clarification.

    A long-winded blog concerning the agony of enduring long-winded blogs is a welcome addition to the Internet. That said, would you consider re-naming your blog after the opening phrase in this post? "I GROW WEARY OF READING"

    and, speaking of phrases, I would appreciate more uses of the following:

    • "Or, we could say that..."
    • "We correctly call this..."
    • "Of course, like in our..."
    • "For the most part though..."
    • "It turns out that..."
    • "...to name but one example"
    • "a term which, by the way..."
    • "depending on how/where..."
    • "But, in some sense of course, that..."
    • "Many complicated factors notwithstanding..."
    • "our precious emotional, physical and mental efforts..."

    Could your next post be made entirely from these phrases? In other words, could you stretch it even further?

    ReplyDelete
  10. tenminute show:

    1) You're welcome for the clarification.

    2) In your second sentence it seems clear that you have misunderstood my motivation for writing this little piece. I grew weary of hearing a false premise being repeated over and over, including by cogent observers, which blames Greed Itself for the financial mess we're in instead of our lack of sociopolitical action to restrain Greed, or policies which actively enable It.

    3) Sorry I can't address any more of your long-winded, agonizing comment, but I grew weary reading it. I'll try to endure the rest of it some time, maybe after December, 2012. Or not.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Bert Stabler says,

    "Good to know that the troll police are monitoring the far reaches of the blogosphere in order to combat the shameless disregard of style manuals with succinct bullet points. "Succinct" and "bullet point"-- that's probably redundant, right? I believe I just split my infinitive in distress.

    Anyway, I was going to say, I got this update from a group of anarchists in New York strategizing for the protests, which included a bunch of anti-pacifist reading links. I responded with something about anti-NRA leftists getting RPG launchers, and someone thought I was insulting D&D. I have this line I hope to use about the new free society in which free-range chickens are being bartered for laptops.

    I've been really into classic KRS albums-- the s/t and Return of the Boom Bap-- which has been making me think about the continuing appeal of Rasta/Panther anti-imperialist militarism. Which I respectfully withdraw from passing judgment on. But college students with bad facial hair do not get to be Buffalo Soldiers."

    ReplyDelete